Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 67
Filter
1.
Interface (Botucatu, Online) ; 26: e210506, 2022.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1364994

ABSTRACT

En este texto presentamos una aproximación al concepto de autonomía aplicado al campo de la salud mental tomando como marco la "Guía para la gestión autónoma de la medicación" (GAM) y su despliegue en Brasil y España. La estrategia GAM plantea una comprensión de la autonomía alejada de una visión individualista para aproximarse a una perspectiva social y colectiva. En este artículo vamos a evidenciar los posibles desplazamientos y las tensiones generadas, así como los efectos de autonomización que conlleva su implementación en salud mental. En la experiencia brasileña, se observa ese desplazamiento desde el lugar del saber-poder, propio de los profesionales, mientras la experiencia española muestra cómo la adaptación de la herramienta parte de la necesaria implicación de los profesionales, de los usuarios/as, sus familias y su red social en un proceso conjunto de trabajo y cuidado colectivo. (AU)


Neste texto apresentamos o conceito de autonomia aplicado ao campo da saúde mental. Para isso tomaremos como referencial uma experiência denominada "Guia para a gestão autônoma de medicamentos" (GAM) e sua implantação em dois contextos geográficos: Brasil e Espanha. A estratégia GAM propõe uma compreensão da autonomia afastando-se de uma visão individualista para se aproximar de uma perspectiva social e coletiva. Neste artigo iremos evidenciar os possíveis deslocamentos e tensões presentes, bem como os possíveis efeitos da autonomização que sua implementação produziu no contexto do cuidado em saúde mental. Assim, na experiência brasileira, observamos como esse deslocamento se produz a partir desse lugar do poder-saber, típico da experiência do profissional, enquanto a experiência espanhola mostra como a adaptação da ferramenta decorre da implicação necessária dos profissionais, usuários, familiares e rede social em um processo conjunto de trabalho e cuidado coletivo. (AU)


In this article we present the concept of autonomy applied to the field of mental health drawing on experiences of the implementation of the "Autonomous Medication Management Guide" in two different contexts: Brazil and Spain. Autonomous medication management proposes an understanding of autonomy that moves away from an individualistic view towards a social and collective perspective. This article highlights potential shifts and tensions and the possible effects of "autonomization" in the context of mental health care. In the Brazilian experience, we observed how this shift is produced from the place of power-knowledge typical of professional practice, while the Spanish experience shows how the adaptation of the tool derives from the necessary involvement of professionals, service users, families and social networks through a joint process of collective working and care. (AU)


Subject(s)
Mental Health , Personal Autonomy , Medication Systems/trends , Psychotropic Drugs/administration & dosage
3.
Nurs Sci Q ; 33(3): 249-257, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32605489

ABSTRACT

The idea of patients self-administering their medication in hospital is not new; it was first cited in literature in 1959. Up to date, there is a growing body of literature that recognizes the importance of this approach. In this current state of the literature, self-administration of medication in hospital is positioned in the context of the definition of health as proposed by Huber et al. and Orem's self-care deficit theory: first identify the concept of medication self-administration, as well as the prevalence, existing procedures, tools, and proven effects of interventions; then the findings should point the way forward for research, practice, and policy.


Subject(s)
Medication Systems/trends , Self Administration/methods , Hospitals/trends , Humans , Medication Systems/standards , Nursing Theory , Self Administration/trends
4.
BMC Palliat Care ; 19(1): 66, 2020 May 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32393231

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The management of medicines towards the end of life can place increasing burdens and responsibilities on patients and families. This has received little attention yet it can be a source of great difficulty and distress patients and families. Dose administration aids can be useful for some patients but there is no evidence for their wide spread use or the implications for their use as patients become increasing unwell. The study aimed to explore how healthcare professionals describe the support they provide for patients to manage medications at home at end of life. METHODS: Qualitative interview study with thematic analysis. Participants were a purposive sample of 40 community healthcare professionals (including GPs, pharmacists, and specialist palliative care and community nurses) from across two English counties. RESULTS: Healthcare professionals reported a variety of ways in which they tried to support patients to take medications as prescribed. While the paper presents some solutions and strategies reported by professional respondents it was clear from both professional and patient/family caregiver accounts in the wider study that rather few professionals provided this kind of support. Standard solutions offered included: rationalising the number of medications; providing different formulations; explaining what medications were for and how best to take them. Dose administration aids were also regularly provided, and while useful for some, they posed a number of practical difficulties for palliative care. More challenging circumstances such as substance misuse and memory loss required more innovative strategies such as supporting ways to record medication taking; balancing restricted access to controlled drugs and appropriate pain management and supporting patient choice in medication use. CONCLUSIONS: The burdens and responsibilities of managing medicines at home for patients approaching the end of life has not been widely recognised or understood. This paper considers some of the strategies reported by professionals in the study, and points to the great potential for a more widely proactive stance in supporting patients and family carers to understand and take their medicines effectively. By adopting tailored, and sometimes, 'outside the box' thinking professionals can identify immediate, simple solutions to the problems patients and families experience with managing medicines.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel/psychology , Medication Systems/standards , Terminal Care/psychology , Adult , Female , Health Personnel/trends , Home Care Services/standards , Home Care Services/trends , Humans , Interviews as Topic/methods , Male , Medication Systems/trends , Middle Aged , Pain Management/methods , Pain Management/psychology , Qualitative Research , Terminal Care/methods
5.
AORN J ; 111(1): 103-112, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31886540

ABSTRACT

Perioperative nurses administer some medications but are primarily responsible for obtaining, preparing, and documenting medications. Unlike personnel in many other patient care areas, perioperative personnel may not have immediate access to a pharmacist; this lack of pharmacy support can complicate medication administration processes. A variety of medication errors occur in the perioperative setting and can negatively affect patients and personnel. Perioperative nurses should review regulatory information and professional organization guidance documents when they work with other health care team members to address medication safety issues. Some recommendations include submitting clear medication orders, using aseptic technique when transferring medications to the sterile field, and using standardized labeling. In addition, perioperative nurses should obtain only one patient's medications from a dispensing unit at a time and prepare one medication at a time. After reviewing this article and the supporting literature, perioperative nurses should have increased knowledge about medication safety.


Subject(s)
Medication Errors/prevention & control , Medication Systems/standards , Patient Safety/standards , Humans , Medication Errors/nursing , Medication Systems/trends , Perioperative Nursing/methods
6.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn ; 11(9): 920-927, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31570130

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is a dilemma in modern medical practice and presents an opportunity for interprofessional collaboration. Our pilot project evaluated whether implementing an interprofessional education (IPE) session would influence awareness of interprofessional values/ethics, roles/responsibilities, communication, and teams/teamwork. INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION ACTIVITY: A dual-institution, multi-part IPE session on medication management was implemented with medicine and pharmacy students. Part 1 consisted of a pillbox exercise whereby students simulated the patient experience of taking medications. Part 2 was an interprofessional medication reconciliation exercise with a standardized patient. After completing the session, students were asked to reflect on their experience in response to a prompt. Reflections were analyzed qualitatively for overarching themes. DISCUSSION: This pilot uniquely captured the interaction between medical and pharmacy students from neighboring institutions. After completing the IPE session, both groups of students felt they were better equipped to take a medication history, perform medication reconciliation, and understand the value of a community pharmacist. Major themes elicited from reflections included: (1) increased awareness of barriers to medication adherence, (2) increased empathy towards adults with polypharmacy, (3) appreciation for the interprofessional team, and (4) realization of the importance of medication reconciliation and patient understanding of their medications. IMPLICATIONS: The collaboration between institutions, located at a distance from one another, demonstrates a novel approach that can be used by others to facilitate IPE. All students gained experience interacting in an interprofessional setting simulating their future practice(s). Future studies are needed to evaluate the extent of those interactions and potential outcomes.


Subject(s)
Medication Systems/trends , Attitude of Health Personnel , Humans , Pilot Projects , Polypharmacy , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Students, Pharmacy/statistics & numerical data
7.
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont) ; 32(2): 102-113, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31613217

ABSTRACT

The electronic medication administration record (eMAR) has been used in hospitals and acute care facilities in Canada for over a decade. Unfortunately, the Canadian continuing care sector has been slow to adopt eMAR usage. Medication delivery in long-term care has traditionally been through paper-based orders and manual documentation in the paper medication administration record. The effectiveness of this manual system as it relates to medication incidents, patient safety and nursing efficiency is not well understood because most of the information is based on anecdotal evidence. Peer-reviewed scientific literature supports the premise that the eMAR, compared to the MAR, is more efficient, significantly reduces medication incidents, promotes patient safety and improves workflow efficiency. In April 2016, the Brenda Strafford Foundation committed to implementing the eMAR at each of our three long-term care facilities to improve medication delivery, reducing and eliminating medication incidents and evaluating the benefits of the electronic system. Under the direction of the clinical team, including nurses, physicians, pharmacists, and the software provider/vendor, an electronic system was developed and new processes for medication delivery were instituted within eight months of starting the project. Since the past year, the evaluation of the eMAR at the Brenda Strafford Foundation demonstrated a reduction in medication delivery time allowing for more time for direct care and a decrease in medication incidents, which directly affects resident health and safety. Nursing and the healthcare aides trained in medication management were surveyed and indicated that the eMAR provides a holistic view of the resident and provides important information readily available to improve the quality of resident care.


Subject(s)
Medication Systems/standards , Patient Safety/standards , Efficiency, Organizational/standards , Feedback , Humans , Medication Errors/nursing , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Medication Systems/trends , Psychological Distance , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
9.
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont) ; 32(SP): 16-28, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31099744

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Healthcare organizations have long been dependent on the vigilance of nurses to identify and intercept medication errors before they can adversely affect patients. New technologies have been implemented in an effort to reduce medication errors; however, few studies have evaluated the long-term effects of technology-based interventions in reducing medication errors. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of barcode medication administration (BCMA) and the closed-loop medication system (CLMS) interventions on medication errors and adverse drug event (ADE) rates. METHODS: An autoregressive integrated moving average model for interrupted time series design was used to evaluate the impact of the BCMA and CLMS interventions on the monthly reported medication error and ADE rates at Humber River Hospital between September 2013 and August 2018. Descriptive statistics were generated to evaluate the types of error and their gravity. RESULTS: A total of 1,712 medication errors and ADEs were reported in the five-year study period. The results of the interrupted time series indicated that the introduction of the BCMA intervention was associated with a statistically significant gradual decrease in reported medication error and ADE rates at 0.002 percentage points per month (p = 0.003). The introduction of the CLMS intervention was associated with an immediate absolute decrease in reported medication error and ADE rates of 0.010% (p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study support the adoption of both BCMA and CLMS interventions to prevent medication errors. Staged implementation of CLMS allows time for learning and incorporating barcode scanning. Interprofessional and cross-functional collaboration is necessary to successfully integrate the requirements of each respective discipline and service in the CLMS.


Subject(s)
Medication Errors/prevention & control , Medication Systems/standards , Humans , Medication Errors/classification , Medication Errors/statistics & numerical data , Medication Systems/statistics & numerical data , Medication Systems/trends , Patient Safety/standards
10.
J Hosp Palliat Nurs ; 21(4): 312-318, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31033645

ABSTRACT

Nurses who care for patients with life-limiting illness operate at the interface of family caregivers (FCGs), patients, and prescribers and are uniquely positioned to guide late-life medication management, including challenging discussions about deprescribing. The study objective was to describe nurses' perspectives about their role in hospice FCG medication management. Content analysis was used to analyze qualitative interviews with nurses from a parent study exploring views on medication management and deprescribing for advanced cancer patients. Ten home and inpatient hospice nurses, drawn from 3 hospice agencies and their referring hospital systems in New England, were asked to describe current practices of medication management and deprescribing and to evaluate a pilot tool to standardize hospice medication review. Analysis of the 10 interviews revealed that hospice nurses are receptive to a standardized approach for comprehensive medication review upon hospice transition and responded favorably to opportunities to discuss medication discontinuation with FCGs and prescribers. Effective framing for discussions included focus on reducing harmful and nonessential medications and reducing caregiver burden. Results indicate that nurses who care for hospice-eligible and enrolled patients are willing to discuss deprescribing with FCGs and prescribers when conversations are framed around medication harms and their impact on quality of life.


Subject(s)
Caregivers/standards , Checklist/methods , Medication Systems/standards , Nurses/psychology , Perception , Caregivers/trends , Female , Humans , Male , Massachusetts , Medical Overuse/prevention & control , Medication Systems/trends , Middle Aged , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Patient-Centered Care
11.
Rev Bras Enferm ; 72(1): 183-189, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30916285

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: to analyze the characteristics of the work organization performed by nursing staff regarding medication administration procedures and their implications on the workload of these professionals and on patient safety. METHOD: the study design is exploratory, with mixed method research and an ecological restorative approach. Data were collected between January 2014 and March 2015, in three inpatient units of a teaching hospital in the south of Brazil, by means of photo walkabout and focus groups, in the qualitative step. In the quantitative phase data were collected from the 162 lists of patients assigned to nursing technicians during their work shifts. RESULTS: the administration of medications has an impact on the professionals' workload and patient safety. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: there are weaknesses in the process that may contribute to medication administration errors, which are related to the number of doses and the number of patients assigned to each professional.


Subject(s)
Medication Systems/standards , Patient Safety/standards , Workload/psychology , Brazil , Focus Groups/methods , Humans , Medication Errors/nursing , Medication Errors/statistics & numerical data , Medication Systems/trends , Nurses/psychology , Nurses/standards , Nursing Assistants/psychology , Nursing Assistants/standards , Patients' Rooms/organization & administration , Qualitative Research , Workload/standards
12.
J Hosp Palliat Nurs ; 21(5): 365-372, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30920493

ABSTRACT

The problem of opioid diversion and its contribution to the opioid epidemic are well known nationally, existing even within hospice care. Proper disposal of opioids may be a critical factor in reducing diversion. In 2014, Ohio implemented legislation requiring a hospice employee to destroy or witness disposal of all unused opioids within a patient's plan of care. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of Ohio Revised Code 3712.062 on hospice programs' policies and procedures to prevent opioid diversion in the home. Directors of Ohio-licensed hospices were surveyed to assess the percentage of programs with a written policy in place for disposal of opioids and to calculate a compliance score based on responses to survey questions assessing compliance with legislation components. Fifty-two surveys were completed (39.4%). All survey respondents reported having a written policy in place. A 95.5% average compliance score was calculated, with the largest disparity occurring with timing of opioid disposal. While Ohio Revised Code 3712.062 requires opioid disposal at the time of patient's death or when no longer needed by the patient, only 84% of respondents report disposing opioids upon discontinuation. Overall, a high compliance rate was seen among hospice programs indicating such regulation is manageable to meet.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Hospice Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Medical Waste Disposal/legislation & jurisprudence , Medication Systems/legislation & jurisprudence , State Government , Analgesics, Opioid/supply & distribution , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy/trends , Hospice Care/methods , Hospice Care/trends , Humans , Medical Waste Disposal/statistics & numerical data , Medication Systems/trends , Ohio , Policy Making , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
World J Emerg Surg ; 14: 5, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30815027

ABSTRACT

Background: Medication errors account for the most common adverse events and a significant cause of mortality in the USA. The Joint Commission has required medication reconciliation since 2006. We aimed to survey the literature and determine the challenges and effectiveness of medication reconciliation in the trauma patient population. Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the effectiveness of medication reconciliation in trauma patients. English language articles were retrieved from PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane Review databases with search terms "trauma OR injury, AND medication reconciliation OR med rec OR med rek, AND effectiveness OR errors OR intervention OR improvements." Results: The search resulted in 82 articles. After screening for relevance and duplicates, the 43 remaining were further reviewed, and only four articles, which presented results on medication reconciliation in 3041 trauma patients, were included. Two were retrospective and two were prospective. Two showed only 4% accuracy at time of admission with 48% of medication reconciliations having at least one medication discrepancy. There were major differences across the studies prohibiting comparative statistical analysis. Conclusions: Trauma medication reconciliation is important because of the potential for adverse outcomes given the emergent nature of the illness. The few articles published at this time on medication reconciliation in trauma suggest poor accuracy. Numerous strategies have been implemented in general medicine to improve its accuracy, but these have not yet been studied in trauma. This topic is an important but unrecognized area of research in this field.


Subject(s)
Medication Systems/standards , Patient Safety/standards , Humans , Medication Errors/mortality , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Medication Reconciliation/methods , Medication Reconciliation/standards , Medication Systems/trends , Trauma Centers/organization & administration , Trauma Centers/standards
14.
Rev. bras. enferm ; 72(1): 183-189, Jan.-Feb. 2019. graf
Article in English | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing | ID: biblio-990655

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: to analyze the characteristics of the work organization performed by nursing staff regarding medication administration procedures and their implications on the workload of these professionals and on patient safety. Method: the study design is exploratory, with mixed method research and an ecological restorative approach. Data were collected between January 2014 and March 2015, in three inpatient units of a teaching hospital in the south of Brazil, by means of photo walkabout and focus groups, in the qualitative step. In the quantitative phase data were collected from the 162 lists of patients assigned to nursing technicians during their work shifts. Results: the administration of medications has an impact on the professionals' workload and patient safety. Final considerations: there are weaknesses in the process that may contribute to medication administration errors, which are related to the number of doses and the number of patients assigned to each professional.


RESUMO Objetivo: analisar as características da organização do trabalho da equipe de enfermagem quanto aos procedimentos de administração de medicamentos e suas implicações na carga de trabalho desses profissionais e na segurança do paciente. Método: estudo exploratório, com método misto de pesquisa e abordagem restaurativa ecológica. Os dados foram coletados entre janeiro de 2014 e março de 2015, em três unidades de internação de um hospital universitário do sul do Brasil, por meio de caminhada fotográfica (CF) e grupos focais (GF) na etapa qualitativa. Na fase quantitativa, foram coletados dados das 162 listas de pacientes atribuídos aos técnicos de enfermagem durante seus turnos de trabalho. Resultados: a administração de medicamentos impacta na carga de trabalho dos profissionais e na segurança dos pacientes. Considerações finais: as fragilidades existentes no processo podem contribuir para erros na administração de medicamentos, que estão relacionados com o número de doses e ao número de pacientes atribuídos a cada profissional.


RESUMEN Objetivo: analizar las características de la organización del trabajo real del equipo de enfermería en cuanto a los procedimientos de administración de medicamentos y sus implicaciones en la carga de trabajo de estos profesionales y en la seguridad del paciente. Método: investigación exploratoria con método mixto y enfoque ecológico y restaurativo. Los datos fueron recolectados entre enero de 2014 y marzo de 2015 en tres unidades de internación de un hospital universitario del sur de Brasil, por medio de caminada fotográfica (CF) y grupos focales (GF) en la etapa cualitativa. En la fase cuantitativa, se recogieron datos de las 162 listas de pacientes asignados a los técnicos de enfermería durante sus turnos de trabajo. Resultados: la administración de medicamentos tiene un impacto en la carga de trabajo de los profesionales y en la seguridad del paciente. Consideraciones finales: hay debilidades en el proceso que pueden contribuir a los errores de administración de medicamentos, que están relacionados con el número de dosis y el número de pacientes asignados a cada profesional.


Subject(s)
Humans , Workload/psychology , Patient Safety/standards , Medication Systems/standards , Patients' Rooms/organization & administration , Brazil , Workload/standards , Focus Groups/methods , Qualitative Research , Medication Errors/nursing , Medication Errors/statistics & numerical data , Medication Systems/trends , Nurses/standards , Nurses/psychology , Nursing Assistants/standards , Nursing Assistants/psychology
15.
Drug Saf ; 42(1): 99-111, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30649735

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This work describes the Medication and Adverse Drug Events from Electronic Health Records (MADE 1.0) corpus and provides an overview of the MADE 1.0 2018 challenge for extracting medication, indication, and adverse drug events (ADEs) from electronic health record (EHR) notes. OBJECTIVE: The goal of MADE is to provide a set of common evaluation tasks to assess the state of the art for natural language processing (NLP) systems applied to EHRs supporting drug safety surveillance and pharmacovigilance. We also provide benchmarks on the MADE dataset using the system submissions received in the MADE 2018 challenge. METHODS: The MADE 1.0 challenge has released an expert-annotated cohort of medication and ADE information comprising 1089 fully de-identified longitudinal EHR notes from 21 randomly selected patients with cancer at the University of Massachusetts Memorial Hospital. Using this cohort as a benchmark, the MADE 1.0 challenge designed three shared NLP tasks. The named entity recognition (NER) task identifies medications and their attributes (dosage, route, duration, and frequency), indications, ADEs, and severity. The relation identification (RI) task identifies relations between the named entities: medication-indication, medication-ADE, and attribute relations. The third shared task (NER-RI) evaluates NLP models that perform the NER and RI tasks jointly. In total, 11 teams from four countries participated in at least one of the three shared tasks, and 41 system submissions were received in total. RESULTS: The best systems F1 scores for NER, RI, and NER-RI were 0.82, 0.86, and 0.61, respectively. Ensemble classifiers using the team submissions improved the performance further, with an F1 score of 0.85, 0.87, and 0.66 for the three tasks, respectively. CONCLUSION: MADE results show that recent progress in NLP has led to remarkable improvements in NER and RI tasks for the clinical domain. However, some room for improvement remains, particularly in the NER-RI task.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Electronic Health Records/trends , Natural Language Processing , Pattern Recognition, Automated/trends , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/diagnosis , Humans , Medication Systems/trends , Pattern Recognition, Automated/methods
16.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn ; 11(1): 66-75, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30527878

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Medication-related problems persist in hospital settings. New types of errors have emerged with changing technology. There is a need for updated, realistic, and patient-specific activities to train student pharmacists to identify medication-related problems. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: We describe efforts to redesign hospital errors and omissions activities in a clinical skills lab course. A hospital errors and omissions template is described with multiple-choice answer options redesigned to reinforce that each instance of dispensing in a hospital is an opportunity for patient-centered care. FINDINGS: In the redesigned hospital errors and omissions activities, students identified the correct errors and omissions 77% of the time with an average point biserial of 0.491. Qualitative evaluation of student course evaluations and student self-selected learning goals suggest that students perceived the revised activity to be valuable. SUMMARY: It is possible to create and deliver hospital errors and omissions activities that include patient-specific medication related problems.


Subject(s)
Education, Pharmacy/standards , Medication Errors/trends , Medication Systems/standards , Curriculum/standards , Curriculum/trends , Education, Pharmacy/methods , Humans , Medication Systems/trends , Qualitative Research
17.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn ; 10(7): 982-989, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30236437

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We developed and implemented a project incorporating ACPE Standard 11 and all Core IPEC competencies at a public University located at a medical center. The project was a collaboration between the colleges of nursing, pharmacy, and medicine at a distance campus location. INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION ACTIVITY: Our Interprofessional Education Activity, which targeted all three elements of ACPE Standard 11, provided TeamSTEPPS® training followed by four medical error simulations. A debriefing took place after each scenario within a team as well as with all four groups following each simulation session. The Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire (TTAQ) was used to evaluate the activity. DISCUSSION: Findings from our interprofessional education activity indicate that while students entered the activity already perceiving teamwork as a positive aspect of safe care delivery, significant improvement in attitudes post training toward specific team constructs was seen across all five domains. The project helped inform the structure of a replication of this effort that is currently underway, with a focus on embedding it in the curricula of all three programs (medicine, pharmacy, and nursing) across campuses. IMPLICATIONS: In summary, working collaboratively in a team while being exposed to a series of medication management scenarios enhances teamwork attitudes as well as potentially improving performance. Based on the positive initial results, plans have begun to extend the experience to other campuses and include a wider group of students.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Medication Systems/standards , Patient Simulation , Students/psychology , Cooperative Behavior , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Medication Systems/trends , Patient Care Team
19.
Aust J Gen Pract ; 47(10): 675-681, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31195769

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medication management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) requires consideration of the residents' goals of care and susceptibility to adverse drug events (ADEs). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to review best practice medication management for residents diagnosed with T2DM. DISCUSSION: Management of T2DM in RACFs is often focused on maintaining residents' quality of life rather than intensive glycaemic management to reduce chronic complications, because the risks of intensive glycaemic management typically outweigh the potential benefits. Australian RACF guidelines recommend individualised glycated haemoglobin targets of 7­8.5% (53­69 mmol/mol). Strategies to reduce the risk of preventable ADEs may include education for residents, carers and staff; assessment of hypoglycaemic risk and renal function; medication review and regimen simplification; de-intensification of glucose-lowering medications; and appropriate end-of-life medication management. Use of a resident-centred multidisciplinary approach and resources tailored to the RACF setting will support residents to achieve best possible health outcomes and quality of life.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Medication Systems/standards , Australia , Blood Glucose/analysis , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/physiopathology , Drug Utilization Review/methods , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Medication Systems/trends , Residential Facilities/organization & administration , Residential Facilities/trends
20.
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont) ; 31(3): 1-3, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30653449

ABSTRACT

A registered nurse of questionable professional competence, with a dodgy employment record, a history of mental illness and substance abuse, remains employed and ultimately murders eight vulnerable seniors, attempts to murder four others, and assaults another two over the course of a decade. At least those are the ones for which Elizabeth Wettlaufer offered a confession. Like most nurses and citizens, I was horrified by the revelation of multiple homicides at the hand of one of us. How could such a confluence of incompetence, mental illness and addiction, and willful murder go undetected for so long by so many?


Subject(s)
Homicide/psychology , Nurses/psychology , British Columbia , Clinical Competence/standards , Crime Victims/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy , Humans , Medication Systems/standards , Medication Systems/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...